Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Windows Vista: Microsoft's Terminator  (Read 7151 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DonnyEMU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 650
    • Show all replies
    • http://blog.donburnett.com
Re: Windows Vista: Microsoft's Terminator
« on: July 24, 2005, 06:08:16 AM »
Considering all the "eye candy" I have been creating with visual studio beta 2, XAML, and the WinFX beta "RC1" lately (it's too bad I can't enter one of the Euro-Demo contests with it).. XAML is pretty cool and coding is very very fast (even for 3d)...

I have developed in C/C++ on the Amiga up to 3.x environments and really I can't see anything currently that is there that really matches the graphics performance and ease of coding..

I think Vista will have very rich uniform user interface which might even be nicer than the Macs.. I just can't understand the continual "Amiga does better" discussion when it's really not in the same ballpark for programmers etc.

I love the Amiga for what it is, even the AmigaOne, but you guys really need to seriously look at what's changing here and evaluate this on a different scale. The world's changing again..

And FYI if I programmed mostly for the Amiga I'd never make a living.. I tried believe me..
======================================
Don Burnett Developer
http://blog.donburnett.com
don@donburnett.com
======================================
 

Offline DonnyEMU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 650
    • Show all replies
    • http://blog.donburnett.com
Re: Windows Vista: Microsoft's Terminator
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2005, 06:45:52 AM »
AmigaOS really isn't *THAT* efficient (if I was writing for the biggest audience of installed machines out there), memory management (keeping track of memory), semaphores and interprocess communication, things like object linking and embedding (OLE) isn't there. I am forced to look after things that the system should be handling for itself. I hear they finally have better memory management in OS/4 but how many installed machines is that really??

The Amiga forces me to write in a very memory conservative way that doesn't always let me add features to software. I hate things like Bptrs and stuff like that.. It does yet still have some "rock star" features but honestly if OS 4 ran on the old CPU then there would be so much more opportunity for the installed base to have "improved" application performance.

If you consider how much stress it is to port a product like FireFox or Open Office to the Amiga platform, I think my point is made very elloquently.. I am not anti-Amiga I love it, I wanna see more "classic" machine expansion, because with that hardware it's still possible with cpu's such as coldfire..

By the way, I will be laughing all the way to the bank ;-)
======================================
Don Burnett Developer
http://blog.donburnett.com
don@donburnett.com
======================================