@monami
I'm confused, you seem to be saying that you didn't like amigans and amigas at the time because the low end model came out after the atari ST and was better than it...and that it was unfair to compare the two because the a500 came out 2 years later.
Does this about sum up your point?
Should I bother pointing out that if the two were in actual market competition then comparing the two does in fact make perfect sense, and that if you want to squabble about who deserves credit for what you should remember that NEITHER Atari nor Commodore invented the majority of technology in either the Atari ST or the OCS Amiga lines?
