Quick question...
When did "If you can't offer a better alternative than the solution offered by a man known to be consistently fraudulent, misleading, and obsessed with manipulating data to satiate his own ego than you obviously have no case for dismissing his claims..."
become a logically valid response to the people who keep
saying "I don't know why it is the way it is, but there are mountains of things to be analyzed and discussed before we even dare go so far as to propose a theory that suggests something as radical as the haughty, ill-educated conspiracy theorist of the astrophysics world has proposed."
You're trolling...go away.
