Argo said:
>"It is not. I resent that. Slander is spoken. In
>print, it's libel." - J. Jonah Jameson
It must also be noted that in order for it to be libel, the libelous person must know that he's spreading misinformation.. Basically he must be knowingly telling lies that hurt the victim of the libel..
Now.. These people that were accused of libel have provided evidence to back their statements.
How can that be libel when the dirty past is thrown at the faces of the crooks who are ripping off their customers?
Sadly, I'm quite interested in an OS4 system, but this nonsense from Eyetech is really deterring me from sending ANY money at all in their general direction.
I'll keep my A4000, thanks. :-P
