Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: dnetc benchmarks  (Read 38273 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pampers

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 146
    • Show all replies
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« on: February 04, 2012, 09:53:22 PM »
Quote from: kas1e;679239
@TheDaddy


Imho you are wrong, as all that threads about founding of truth. If used and old macs can be faster in some areas than x1000, then why not say that ? We should know truth, and i very intersting in truth.

As you can see, on some benchmarks (expectually memory ones), x1000 are cleary faster, and no one tryint to hide that details, everything just in sake of truth, to know, if it better than used macs, or not. So  users will known what they will get, and they can think what will be better for them and in terms of speed, and in terms of price.

Good point. There is no fake or lie in this benchmarks. I thing most 'sensitive' ppl from whatever blue or red camp are takin' it too serious.

There is new Amiga related hardware, amigans ALWAYS were about benchmarking - since I remember so keep our tradition going :) If someone is mad that he spent 3k USD and his machine is sometimes slowe than old mac - sorry to hear that. If some one spent 3k USD and he doesn't give a **** that his machine is slower sometimes than old mac - fair play to him, he doesn't have to care.

Anyway - for all new X1000 owners - congrats :)