Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Which is better? OS 4 or Morph OS . . .  (Read 11174 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SamuraiCrow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2281
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Which is better? OS 4 or Morph OS . . .
« on: October 08, 2005, 04:53:16 PM »
They are both about even.  MorphOS has better backward-compatability to AOS 3.x but AOS4 has more flexible library interfaces that will allow better backward compatability in the future (not to mention that it supports some POSIX-style shared libraries).
 

Offline SamuraiCrow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2281
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Which is better? OS 4 or Morph OS . . .
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2005, 10:18:53 PM »
MorphOS with a Linux dual-boot is equivalent to the not-yet-released AmigaOS 4 except that AOS 4 will never support fork(). :-P
 

Offline SamuraiCrow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2281
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Which is better? OS 4 or Morph OS . . .
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2005, 04:12:56 PM »
I guess Karlos is a betatester or knows one because the classic versions of AOS 4 and Petunia aren't going to be released until the final release.  The main advantage of Petunia over MOS' JIT is that Petunia will be supported under EUAE.  (Of course if you wanted to download the source to EUAE and splice it together yourself you could.)
 

Offline SamuraiCrow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2281
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Which is better? OS 4 or Morph OS . . .
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2005, 05:08:32 PM »
@Piru

Fair enough.  The author of EUAE, Rich Drummond, had expressed an interest in using Petunia in conjunction with EUAE but it wasn't finallized.