Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: vampire video speed vs dedicated RTG cards  (Read 6639 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline roomeo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 35
    • Show all replies
Re: vampire video speed vs dedicated RTG cards
« on: April 07, 2017, 08:49:30 PM »
When i saw those results posted earlier i got curious how memory speed would be without saga running at all...

Some explanations on results you see here.

v500+ pal2: saga monitor driver is not in devs/monitors, and running pal640x256x4 when testing.
v500+ pal1: saga monitor driver is loaded from devs/monitors, but the resolution is switched to pal640x256x4 before running the test.
you: this is test is run with the screen resolution you see in the screenmode prefs window on the screen. This is the same saga resoultion used in v500+pal1 test, so switching to no-saga resolutions seems to have the saga-core running in the background when not used.

running v500+ gold core 2, and i believe x11 speed.

cheers! :)

« Last Edit: April 07, 2017, 08:54:54 PM by roomeo »
a500 - Vampire500+
a600 - aca620/indiECS/Subway - Soon to be sold. :(
a4000 - 16mb Fast / Apollo4060@66mhz (ram not working) / X-Surf + RapidRoad / FastlaneZ3 64mb + Acard ARS-2000FU -> CfIDE / Delfina Lite / PicassoIV ... Who needs PCI?!