Interesting 1200

[Kawazu]

Interesting. I'd always heard the complete opposite, that Sysinfo doesn't use the full power of the '060 so always under-scores it, but the other programs can make use of both integer units, so will give a fairer estimate.

You are right.
Dont listen to LaserBack, just read this thread and see for yourself.
Always bashing on everything that aint sysinfo.

http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=59096






From: http://www.amigaspeed.de.vu/

[Kawazu]

don't be idiot what do you think ? that the 060 is a core i7 ? loi
that's graphic results are accurate of course were not done with the buggy sysspeed
and you can see I'm right that the 060/50 is only 1.3x faster than the 040/040
sysspeed reports 28 mips on the 040/40 and 66mips on the 060/50 and that's totally out of range and giving the 040 a weak weak integer result
to make sure what I'm talking about anyone can get sysspeed modules of both processors on aminet and compare

http://aminet.net/util/moni/A1240_040.lha
http://aminet.net/util/moni/A2k_50_60_Bliz.lha

So you are calling me an idiot?
After reading that last thread nothing you write on these forums will be taken seriously.

And what are you talking about that the graph is showing that 060/50 is only 1.3 times faster then 040/40?
The 040/40 gets 41MIPS while the 060/50 gets 80 mips. How the hell do you get that to 1.3 times faster? 1.3 times faster yould be 53.3mips