Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: New Protracker - your input is welcome  (Read 12263 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Blomberg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 796
    • Show all replies
Re: New Protracker - your input is welcome
« on: November 18, 2002, 09:18:15 PM »
It's been a few years (a lot really), since I've used ProTracker, so I don't really know what recent versions are capable of, but a thing I have been missing in both Amiga and PC trackers is improved mapping capabilities.
To be able to use multisamples (of ALL keys) and map each sample to a different key on the keyboard, and being able to fine tune and transpose each sample individually.

Offline Blomberg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 796
    • Show all replies
Re: New Protracker - your input is welcome
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2002, 02:39:42 AM »
Quote

Kay wrote:
*MIDI support. I wanna use my keyboard!!!
*Sorry if I am clueless, but: One of the things that annoyed me a bit when working with samples was that their length was altered when played at different frequencies (ie different tones). If there is any way of altering the frequency without altering the length, I want it implemented! :-)

Ah yes, MIDI support is mandatory  :-D
And yes, it would be great to have some sort of pitch shift - time preserved and vice versa but maybe this is more a job a plugin, I donno.

@ Wacoon
Music in surround???  :-D
Call me old fashioned but what's wrong with stereo? Surround is for movies and games.  :-D

Offline Blomberg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 796
    • Show all replies
Re: New Protracker - your input is welcome
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2002, 12:42:06 PM »
I agree (in part) with Tickly, don't turn it into Fruity.

Keep the pattern interface the way it is, or else it won't be a tracker anymore, besides I can't stand Fruityloops's (and other newer apps) way of putting everything on buttons. I know it's done to mimic real hardware sequencers and drum machines, but let's not forget that this is software, there *are* better ways than buttons, besides, point and click interfaces can only go so far as far as productivity is concerned, once you're in a routine point and click is simply too slow (and a hassle). Even though I'm currently a Reason user, I *never* use the buttons on the drum machine because it's limited what you can do with it compared to a full sequencer and (as I said before) a hassle to use.
The usual tracker interface would be ideal for me, though with the ability to colour some rows in a different colour so you don't get lost in the rows and columns.

I do agree, however, that a more easily managed 'song mode' as Simo calls it would be a good idea. That's where I usually get lost when using trackers once the song gets too big with too many parts (or patterns or whatever you call them).