>How do you know what I buy ? I know that Genesi and Amiga >are competitior, why shouldn't I know.
I was merely reading between the lines (thus I said "seems"). You suggested that Genesi would have nothing to gain from Amiga going under. My suggestion is that it was a line of spin on their part because, whether true or not, Genesi acts as if they do have something to gain from that.
>However thats no reason for not having a businessrelation... >or ?
I'm sure Amiga has some good reasons (obvious reasons) for not wanting DE on Genesi, and in such a market it is understandable. In my opinion, spending any amount of time porting DE might be considered a waste of time, and while I'm sure they'll put out a 4.X version, a Morphos version would just be a further waste.
>And some questions to you also as you make some >statements;
>1; Who is the Amiga developers that Genesi have tried to >bring to court ?
The key to that is in the word "court," as in actively trying to get them to develop products for Morphos. Not, "take them to court!"
As far as a question of bankrupting Amiga through the courts, bbvr doesn't actually deny that it might be something of an incentive (does this contradict the above--sure it does, but one can't expect them to come out and be that blunt) . Think back to that ANN thread a few months ago.
