Kickstart, I normally ignore ill informed posts, but as this one is directed at me, I will list my Amiga heritage.
First Amiga in 1986, constant use of Amiga until 1997. 6 year gap. Missed the red blue wars. Returned in 2006.
A500 x4 with various accelerators and WB setups
A600 with 030 and ClassicWB
A1200 x3 with 030 accelerators
A1200 Mediator BPPC @ 330mhz 060 @ 70mhz OS3.9 - Sold
A1200 BPPC @240 060 @50 BVision OS 3.9 - Sold
AmigaOne X1000 OS4.1 update 6
Does this qualify me to hold an opinion on the X1000 that I use everyday? Or perhaps I should be doing what many others do, read spurious forum posts and form an opinion having never even seen a real X1000?
You should not react to posts like this. We all have different definitions of "Amiga" today (for me it is the "classic" line with todays continuations including Aros 68k and AROS, AmigaOS and MorphOS as something different), you see X1000 and AmigaOS as Amiga, others see MorphOS as Amiga who cares...
The split is strength and curse at the same time, strength because we (in opposite f.e. to C64 or Atari community) have modern implementations partly even on different hardware, curse because it splits the resources. We should try to compete against each other and make best offers and try to peruade users with it and not bash each other or call other "trolls" and similar.