Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Consequences of the AmigaOS 3.1 source code "leak", one year after?  (Read 36892 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Thorham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1150
    • Show all replies
Quote from: Thomas Richter;819127
And no, that's exactly what you *cannot* do. The consequences are that your program will be taken down
You can do what ever the hell you want, and depending on what you're doing, no one might ever find out that you based your work on someone else's work.
 

Offline Thorham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1150
    • Show all replies
Re: Consequences of the AmigaOS 3.1 source code "leak", one year after?
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2017, 11:59:53 AM »
Quote from: Pat the Cat;819273
Anyway, ARexx was a much better choice, in my opinion. An ideal fit for a multitasking OS. Much much much more sensible than any version of Basic. Be able to talk and control between different running applications. That was a much more powerful tool than a programming language aimed at beginners.
It's a pity Lua wasn't around back then.
 

Offline Thorham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1150
    • Show all replies
Re: Consequences of the AmigaOS 3.1 source code "leak", one year after?
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2017, 02:35:06 PM »
I wonder what the REAL truth is...