I must admit I find the whining about the performance of the Pi on a forum where a large number of members still stick to hardware with CPUs where double digit MIPS values are considered fast...
Exactly! :-)
You would think we'd be supremely aware of the waste in the "higher numbers mean better" fallacy...
And not just retro...
I have a 400Mhz Nokia 770 tiny tablet...
My wife got me an 800Mhz Android tablet recently..
Both are crazy fun, for different things...
But frequently, the 770 is faster and more responsive than the 800Mhz tablet..
Why, Android....
It has some great benefits (remember, I think the tablet is great), but Android has some serious overhead...
So, I can imagine the Pi, with a stripped down Linux running really fast, even given it's specs....
My only complaint (I've mentioned a few times) is that it doesn't do RGB, so I can't use it as a MAME device in my cabinet (I have a real arcade monitor)..
And, to be honest, I think it probably won't help education...
I think it could.. I just think it won't.. Knowing the system nowadays, it won't be adopted widely enough and/or they'll choose all the wrong software..
Yeah, I'm cynical.. ;-)
But I think the Pi can be a success, just not the way they intend it to be..
Hobbiest and embedded market...
Higher education even... Prepping for embedded system careers..
But K-12, I have my doubts...
desiv
p.s. Just noticed something turned one of my phrases into a VigLink to an Amazon search? Is that something Amiga.org is doing now? Not necessarily a problem; I just noticed it....