Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: lame benchmarks (pun intended)  (Read 21894 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline haywirepc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1331
    • Show all replies
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« on: February 03, 2012, 12:46:33 AM »
Where can I find a windows binary of this lame encoder? Looked but only found source tarballs. I'd like to run this test on a windows and linux machine and see the results and how they stack up against x1000 on quad core and 6 core intel machines.

Steven
 

Offline haywirepc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1331
    • Show all replies
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2012, 02:19:35 AM »
I got 7 seconds on a quad core intel windows xp box.
 
I got 6 seconds on a quadcore intel ubuntu box.
 
Both those machines would cost less than 500$ right now.
 
For me, that kind of puts many things in perspective about the x1000.
 
Thanks Piru.
 
Steven