Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Emo  (Read 8331 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline that_punk_guyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Emo
« on: February 27, 2004, 03:51:45 PM »
Not really about "entertainment", but it's about music, so it kinda fits here, I suppose...

I'd be very interested to hear what your ideas are, if any, on what this word 'emo' (in terms of a musical genre/scene) actually means. I want to go further and explain exactly why I'm asking, except I think I don't want to risk influencing what anyone says, so...

(I am also aware of the bells tolling in the distance, and that tumbleweed just there, but I don't care!)
 

Offline that_punk_guyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: Emo
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2004, 06:01:58 PM »
Very intresting :-)

More comments!
 

Offline that_punk_guyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: Emo
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2004, 03:02:41 PM »
Quote
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Oh yeah, it isn't "Commercialism" that is killing music, it is "Pop Idol" :-(


Same difference...
 

Offline that_punk_guyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: Emo
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2004, 03:27:27 PM »
Quote
bloodline wrote:
Not to hijack your thread punkie, but what do people know about the "Romo" music scene?


Interesting... "Romo" makes me think "new romantic," makes me think of the 80s and goth... I don't know if there's a genuine link there or just punkiebrains. :-)
 

Offline that_punk_guyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: Emo
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2004, 02:00:37 PM »
Right, I suppose I should elaborate on why I asked this question.

The actual "trigger", what got me thinking about it, was a disagreement I had with Vincent about the Foo Fighters and whether they had become more emo. The first problem with using the word "emo" is that it doesn't describe the music's style at all. I think the guitar sounds and songwriting style on 'The Colour And The Shape' are reminiscent of "real" emo bands (ie. bands that were labelled so before it became trendy.) Vincent said the new stuff is emo.

I don't the kind of ego that would have me believe I'm right about it just because I listen to more of that stuff than he does, so I sat down and thought about it, and in the meantime started this thread.

I totally identify with Cyberus' frustration at the trendy kids, although I differ in that he lays the blame at Bad Religion for depoliticising punk rock. The first bands to break away onto the (yet to be labelled) emo path around the mid-eighties actually made a conscious decision to write about personal experiences instead of politics, because as Cyberus points out, political punk/hardcore was already done to death. This happened in parallel with Bad Religion's own "revolution", which is said to have saved the LA punk scene from falling apart in the midst of violence and stabbings at shows.

This was the point at which the punk/hardcore and modern indie-rock scenes amalgamated. It's pretty much all the same scene now.

I lay the blame at major labels. The music marketed as punk and emo in major magazines - Kerrang!, melody Maker/NME etc - just isn't punk and emo (indie). They're pop-bands, venture capitalists with stupid sweeping fringes. But of course, the major labels also pay for much of the advertising space in Kerrang!, so what they say is cool is cool, and people stupid enough to buy Kerrang! and not read the (usually still fairly honest) reviews will go into record shops and ask for "emo" CDs. This is why the real emo kids hate emo ;-)

Because while at first, it was just exceptionally well-written melodic independantly produced rock music, it's become a sound and a look. (Someone came on the Get Up Kids forum the other day and asked about getting an emo haircut. And he wasn't joking.) And everyone seems to have an opinion on it... even though no-one's sure what it even means anymore.
 

Offline that_punk_guyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: Emo
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2004, 06:24:44 PM »
Quote

Vincent wrote:
Quote

that_punk_guy wrote:
Right, I suppose I should elaborate on why I asked this question.

The actual "trigger", what got me thinking about it, was a disagreement I had with Vincent about the Foo Fighters and whether they had become more emo.


Handbags at 10 paces? :-P


:lol:

Nah, like I said that's what got me thinking about it, but that's not really the reason I asked. :-)

Quote

Quote
The first problem with using the word "emo" is that it doesn't describe the music's style at all. I think the guitar sounds and songwriting style on 'The Colour And The Shape' are reminiscent of "real" emo bands (ie. bands that were labelled so before it became trendy.) Vincent said the new stuff is emo.

I don't the kind of ego that would have me believe I'm right about it just because I listen to more of that stuff than he does, so I sat down and thought about it, and in the meantime started this thread.


Looking into the word/classification/whatever of emo has got me thinking.  I only really know emo from the rag mags.  I'd been hearing it over the past 5 or so years, but never really knew what it was until maybe 2 years ago.  Well, I thought I knew anyway.


What are your ideas on what it is? I'd really like to know, doesn't matter what they are. :-)

Quote

Quote
I lay the blame at major labels. The music marketed as punk and emo in major magazines - Kerrang!, melody Maker/NME etc - just isn't punk and emo (indie). They're pop-bands, venture capitalists with stupid sweeping fringes. But of course, the major labels also pay for much of the advertising space in Kerrang!, so what they say is cool is cool, and people stupid enough to buy Kerrang! and not read the (usually still fairly honest) reviews will go into record shops and ask for "emo" CDs. This is why the real emo kids hate emo ;-)


I take it you haven't picked up a copy of Kerrang! recently then?  The only honest reviews I've seen in there recently was the whole issue with the 110 greatest albums.  And even then, some of the reviews were utter balls that only served to lick up to certain bands.

Kerrang is no longer a music magazine, it hasn't been for quite some time.  It's now the music equivalent of the Daily Sport.


I thought about that after I submitted the post but I couldn't clarify 'cause I had to rush off for an interview. Last Kerrang! I picked up was #991. That's the first issue in about six months, a stopped reading it regularly a couple of years ago when it ceased to be at all relevant to anything I was listening to. I occasionally leaf through it at ASDA out of half-arsed interest but it's just so blah, besides if I want to know when the next Deicide or Deftones record is out, I can look on the web.

The smaller reviews aren't so bad, IMO. (Although one suspects favours might even be given just to appear in the reviews pages... There's no way they only get 30 CDs a week sent for review.) Of course, that amounts to one page out of 74 that's worth even looking at.

I guess what gives me the impression that the reviews are more honest is that they seem fairly happy to stick artists on the cover when they've just slated the new record, just because it's popular regardless.