T_Bone wrote:
Your analogy doesn't make sense. Are you saying the $100k from the parking space is "meant" for someone? Who?
If these people wanted to do some good for the world, they might use that money for good. That's your kids in this analogy. Why would they give money to Harrods (or whoever's reselling the space) if they really wanted to use it for good? They cannot be sure of what Harrods will do with it, and it's highly unlikely that it's exactly what they intend.
In other words I don't think anyone who truly wanted to do good with the money would say, "hey, the money isn't lost, it's just a transaction."
And like your analogy, are you saying that instead of selling the parking space, it should be given away? why? Neither way creates wealth. :-?
Why do we want to create wealth when it gets squandered like this? Why on Earth do Harrods need to charge people for the privilege of parking near the shop?
It should not be "given away," it should remain the property of Harrods and be freely available for the use of all their customers.