Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: DVD vs. VHS  (Read 11654 times)

Description:

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: DVD vs. VHS
« on: August 13, 2004, 07:08:45 PM »
Hmmmm? Seems like a no-brainer to me. They both have shortcomings in the picture department but you can see the those of VHS on a standard TV. For DVD I need to stare at a good monitor. Soundwise, there's no contest.

The only reason I keep my VHS tapes are sentimental value.
 

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: DVD vs. VHS
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2004, 07:50:44 PM »
It's like the LP/CD argument except it makes far less sense. ;-)
 

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: DVD vs. VHS
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2004, 04:36:27 PM »
:-?

Every player I've seen has a resume feature of some sort.
 

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: DVD vs. VHS
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2004, 04:50:53 PM »
Heh... That's what manuals are for. ;-)
 

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show all replies
Re: DVD vs. VHS
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2004, 09:22:22 PM »
Quote
iamaboringperson wrote:
Quote
whabang wrote:
A properly encoded high bitrate MPEG2-stream is almost identical to the original.
See, that's the problem.

Almost identical.


You surely can't be suggesting that LD replicates the original perfectly?


Anyways, Eyso has a good point. A worthy film will keep your attention regardless of the format it's on.