Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: debian hardinfo benchmarks  (Read 22084 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
debian hardinfo benchmarks
« on: May 01, 2012, 11:34:01 PM »
1st graph where lower bar means better result:


2nd graph where higher bar means better result:


sources:

Sam440ep-Flex 800MHz and AmigaONE X1000 1.8GHz: http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=35671&forum=34&22
PowerBook G4 1.67GHz: my own test run
 

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: debian hardinfo benchmarks
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2012, 01:20:45 AM »
Quote from: klx300r;691344
For a real world example run a Blender demo on only one cpu and then run it with all the cpu's cores and then you will see real 'facts'

See Linux PowerPC Blender benchmark
 

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: debian hardinfo benchmarks
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2012, 02:32:54 PM »
Quote from: drHirudo;691575
The PA6T may perform the same, which is no wonder, considering it is chip developed some years ago. But the PA6T consumes much less power, which is relevant for people like me who are paying the electricity bills by themselves. Hmm, may be I shall create electricity consumptions benchmarks.

Okay, let me begin with 26W at idle and 40W at full load for my PowerBook G4.

How does your X1000 do?