Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: lame benchmarks (pun intended)  (Read 21911 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #14 from previous page: February 04, 2012, 12:34:15 PM »
It appears mr Mufa claims that I've "faked" the results. Thus I've decided to release couple of photographs showing the results:

http://sintonen.fi/pics/bench_raw_macmini_g4_15.jpg
http://sintonen.fi/pics/bench_raw_powerbook_g4_167.jpg

Excuse the poor quality of these pictures. They should still serve their purpose however.
 

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #15 on: June 25, 2012, 11:34:04 AM »
Quote from: vox;697854
Please use Linux Mint 11 on both
http://mintppc.org/
Or Debian Wheezy on both and redo the math.
Unfortunately no-one is willing to run benchmarks on their X1000 anymore. I wonder why that is...

Quote
Looking forward to compare those tests to these and let us know of how much space there is for MOS and OS4 to grow on same hardware.
Actually MorphOS is faster than Linux in some areas, so I don't see much point in these tests.