Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Amiga DOOM VS Pocket Calc DOOM  (Read 6470 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Amiga DOOM VS Pocket Calc DOOM
« on: February 24, 2011, 08:17:52 AM »
Quote from: XDelusion;617328
Even with the Indivision Amiga is slower!

How does Indivision affect Doom speed in any way?
Logged
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Amiga DOOM VS Pocket Calc DOOM
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2011, 10:07:15 AM »
Ah new Indivision ECS features. Something like this wouldn't be possible with the old indivision AGA design.

Quite neat, though it would be even cooler to have real CGX drivers for it.
Logged
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Amiga DOOM VS Pocket Calc DOOM
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2011, 03:02:35 PM »
Quote from: Crumb;617683
I guess that an RTGMaster.library IndiECS & Graffiti drivers wouldn't be hard to write. It would come handy for a pair of games

Well RTGMaster is quite messy and buggy, and only very limited set of SW supports it. The real benefit would come from RTG driver for either cgx or picasso96.
Logged
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »