Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Reaction vs MUI (as what concerns the API)  (Read 20953 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Reaction vs MUI (as what concerns the API)
« on: February 13, 2011, 11:00:32 AM »
Quote from: Minuous;615159
ReAction is the official AmigaOS GUI, this applies to both 3.x and 4.x.

Not quite. AmigaOS 3.0 and 3.1 official GUI is gadtools. ClassAct was some obscure GUI toolkit needed bu some random applications such as AWeb. It was inferior compared to MUI back then already and making it official GUI toolkit for later AmigaOS versions didn't change that fact.
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Reaction vs MUI (as what concerns the API)
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2011, 09:01:59 PM »
Quote from: lsmart;615251
Like QT is for some random desktops like KDE?

At least QT has some real use outside of a handful of applications.

Quote
AWeb was something you had to install in 1995. AWeb was the modern internet.

Luckily I didn't do internet in 1995. AWeb user interface is just plain horrible.