Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: X1000 CPU is PWRficient PA6T  (Read 22726 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
« Last Edit: June 21, 2010, 05:31:43 PM by Piru »
 

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: X1000 CPU is PWRficient PA6T
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2010, 03:49:38 PM »
Quote from: yoodoo;566424
A-Eon have made it clear several times that the XMOS chip was Varisys' idea, rather than theirs and has been put on as an almost free extra (£10 or so on a £1500+ board).
They have? Where?

Quote
The hype came from certain over-enthusiastic community members, NOT A-Eon or Hyperion.
Have you already forgotten about the "What is X?" nonsense?
 

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: X1000 CPU is PWRficient PA6T
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2010, 05:59:55 PM »
Quote from: KimmoK;569104
GPGPU
Isn't that a bit premature considering there isn't even 3D support for the included Radeon X700 card yet?

As far as I can tell both ATI and nVidia are keeping their GPU stream processing drivers closed source (and binaries are only available for x86 and amd64). So where is this GPGPU stuff coming form then?
« Last Edit: July 05, 2010, 06:04:57 PM by Piru »
 

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: X1000 CPU is PWRficient PA6T
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2010, 12:39:14 AM »
Quote from: warpdesign;569426
What if you had enough *native* apps to get rid of legacy ones ?

You won't. The potential market is way too small for serious commercial apps. If your software library consists of ports of X or linux apps why not run linux directly then?