Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: So X1000 was there, any pics of it running?  (Read 15878 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: So X1000 was there, any pics of it running?
« on: June 19, 2010, 11:30:14 PM »
Someone once said "you can only make first impression once".

To me it appears that Aeon painted themselves in a corner: The event was so hyped and drummed up that they had to show something running, regardless of the state. I think it didn't do them any favors.

Combine that with the rather unprofessional presentation (no PA system, hello?), vague answers ("north of £1500", "likely before christmas"), demoing the system without the component that was largely driving the marketing (no xena chip was present), breaking the earlier promises (being available during summer, that was the suggestion as everyone understood it) and still not revealing the CPU and you have a disaster.

Being unprepared for the presentation is just inexcusable ("I only found out 10 mins before we were down to give one. It was all very last minute, although I found out later that it was in the actual Event programme"). Being "surprised" by the interest is as bad. The whole event was drummed for months, and then you're surprised by the attendance? ("The Amiga "tent"was always busy, especially around the A-EON/Hyperion/ACube area, the suddenly the tent seemed to fill up and it seemed that 100's of people crowded around the A-EON area."). This is plain unprofessional.

No doubt there will be those who will get it regardless, but forget attracting anyone else outside of the very hardcore community.

Considering this all I very much doubt if the company will survive in the long run.


Update: Now that I think about it, the whole thing appears a huge déjà vu: Original AmigaOne and Eyetech. It saddens me that little has been learnt from the earlier mistakes.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2010, 10:51:28 AM by Piru »
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: So X1000 was there, any pics of it running?
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2010, 09:17:56 AM »
Quote from: Akiko;565710
@Piru

To me it appears alot more profesional than other certain developers that seem to devote way to much of their time trawling through every piece of OS4 related news spreading fud and crap.

You wish to refute any of my points, or just post baseless accusations? If you have anything constructive to say, I'm all ears.

How I spend my spare time is my business. Don't worry, MorphOS is advancing very well and will likely soon support even more affordable Mac hardware.
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: So X1000 was there, any pics of it running?
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2010, 09:34:52 AM »
Quote from: drHirudo;565792
Go on. I am waiting for the time when there will be a reason to install MorphOS on my PowerBook G4. But to install it, the OS have to be better than MacOS X Tiger, or else, why bother?
You can always have a dual boot setup, then you can keep using mostly Mac OS X Tiger if you wish. You don't even have to pay anything if you just wish to play around with MorphOS 30 minutes at a time. That's already enough of a reason to install it, just to see what MorphOS can do.

PS. MorphOS is blazingly fast on the PowerBook G4.
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: So X1000 was there, any pics of it running?
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2010, 06:49:23 AM »
Quote from: kolla;565981
time is running and wasting time on even more obsolete hardware is rather pointless
It has more point than wasting resources/effort on insanely expensive custom HW, though.

Also, most of the Mac HW we're adding support for is very similar to each other. Adding support for them doesn't take excessive resources.

I can think many things that are far more pointless. ;-)
« Last Edit: June 21, 2010, 08:35:15 AM by Piru »