Amigazeux is proud to present an update to OS4Emu: nothing changed!

[Piru]

@xeron

How the hell can they claim to have 4.1 features when 4.1 isn't even out? What a load of {bleep}.

itix tells you how.

its lies

Lies? Isn't that a bit strong statement?

Which bit is a lie?

Frankly I'm a bit surprised by this hostility. Isn't it a good thing to have interoperability between the systems? It might even mean more sales for OS4 software. And isn't there MOSEmu for OS4, too?

[Piru]

@Vulture

The other thing you said, MOSEmu? Where's that?

http://www.amiga-news.de/en/news/AN-2004-12-00113-EN.html

I have no clue what came of it but clearly such thing existed at some point at least.

[Piru]

@xeron

Its either lies, or he's illegally got his hands on files that are not released for the public.

You have a weird definition of illegal.

I see amigaworld.net has removed the thread where itix posted more details about the methods used. So I guess the moderators there aren't interested about the truth after all?

[EDIT]Ah excuse me jumping the gun, they're just "checking the facts".[/EDIT]

[Piru]

@MissYo

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/excuse

You remember ''facts'', don't you? Need a dictionary.com link?

...

Oh, by the way... for most of us... piracy is illegal. And, from reading your postings here, I definitely think you need to look THAT word up.

I find your tone quite offensive, but yes, I know piracy is illegal.

Which postings have you been reading exactly? The ones where I've tried to educate people about copyright, immaterial rights and the fact that there really is no such things as "abandonware"? Or the numerous postings I've made over the years about removing piracy links? I assume you're mixing me with someone else.

The thread that now is under the truth commission review actually saw a posting made by itix that explained how the OS 4.1 API details were derived. Is that what is now under review?