Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: PFS Vs SFS Which is better.  (Read 4163 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: PFS Vs SFS Which is better.
« on: October 14, 2003, 05:32:34 AM »
I've used PFS back from days it was still a hobby project called PFS. It later changed into AFS, then back to PFS2 and finally PFS3.

I turned to AFS only when the ffs2afs tool was made available, and I could convert all remaining ffs filesystems to AFS.

I now use PFS3 on my Pegasos.

PFS/AFS/PFS2/PFS3 has never caused any problems or data loss.
Logged
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: PFS Vs SFS Which is better.
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2003, 11:00:17 AM »
Quote
Also, I use a lot of Linux. Only Amiga filesystem with Linux support is FFS, so nothing else is really worth it.

SFS linux driver

It is read only, though.

There are 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 kernel adaptations of the patch. For further details ask the author Marek Szyprowski or .
Logged
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »