And so far, we've ascertained that the bare board doesn't violate ROHS rules, so why continue to push this issue?
They are two completely separate points.
We're doing A only because of B.
You don't need to do A because B doesn't apply.
Yes, we're doing A only because of B.
You don't need to do A because B doesn't apply.
Yes....
So this intrigues me as to the real motive/whether they are arguing disingenuously.
Also, say you give me money when I go out to buy a cup of coffee, so that I might get you one.
Does this put me in business as a supplier of coffee?
I don't know the people on a1k.org and they are controlling who can buy the board. So it's not a good analogy.
If you pursuaded starbucks to stock your own special blend of coffee which they would only supply to customers that you authorised and I gave you money and you told them to produce a cup of your special blend of coffee for me, then yes you are in business as a supplier of coffee.
No guys, businesses are licensed entities.
Licensed for what and by whom?
I can get up tomorrow and find someone who is willing to pay me to work tomorrow. That would be my business and I don't need a license. As a self employed person I may be required to fill in a tax return, but if I don't then that doesn't stop me from being a business.
Surely these old chips cause less harm to the earth if they are used as opposed to entering landfill?
I believe ROHS allows for the re-use of old chips for repairing equipment made before 2006. Of course
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus becomes relevant here. I certainly should be allowed to buy NOS chips to repair an a500+ and I should also be allowed to buy a brand new pcb. But getting cases, keyboards and pcbs manufactured and fitting them with NOS chips maybe not.