Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Philosophical Question - Amiguing  (Read 39506 times)

Description:

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show all replies
Re: Philosophical Question - Amiguing
« Reply #14 from previous page: July 28, 2013, 04:02:20 PM »
Quote from: bloodline;742804
...But worse, much worse than that, it implies that a machine could never be "intelligent" or "creative" or even be considered as sentient. This to me seems absurd, I think it's perfectly reasonable to have sentient machines and for that I will argue :)


Pure science fiction, the idea of sentient machines.
Machines that mimic sentient behavior so well that it seems realistic?
Sure.

Now your point on animals?
I wholly agree, they deserve consideration.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show all replies
Re: Philosophical Question - Amiguing
« Reply #15 on: July 29, 2013, 02:55:47 AM »
Quote from: bloodline;742845
Doesn't answer the question, if a machine can be sentient? ;)


And, further, how will we tell?
What if its just a really good simulation of sentient thought?
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"