Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga Multitask  (Read 18946 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga Multitask
« on: August 31, 2012, 07:34:28 AM »
Quote from: Thorham;705685
All I'm saying is that preemptive multitasking isn't impressive from the computer hardware's point of view, because just about anything can do it properly ;)

That last word invalidates your statement.
Properly would mean efficiently and with a measure of utility and many early microprocessor can not provide that.

The 6809, yes. The 68K, yes. Early Intel processors? Not well at all.
Minix was probably the only example of this that worked reasonably well (until the '386).
« Last Edit: August 31, 2012, 07:36:51 AM by Iggy »
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga Multitask
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2012, 12:42:18 AM »
Quote from: bitcpy;706022
Dont forget about Xenix. It ran very well on the 286 and 386 platform.

Yep. although it ran better on a 68K.
 
And only Minix ran on earlier processors.
 
BTW I had an MPM machine (got rid of it).
I thought those were Z-80 powered.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"