I still get a little confused when comparing dos systems. Which would be a faster, better computer/processor?
1. An older (maybe 5 to 7 Y.O.) system with a 2.52ghz processor?
2. A 3 year old system with an Intel Core 2 Duo 1.80ghz?
Number 1 is what I use daily. Number 2 is being offered to me by someone moving at a hard to resist price.
What are you comparing? If the older system is a P4, put it down, step back and walk away from it.
The entire Netburst design only proved that Intel could still make really stupid decisions.
The entire shift to Core2 was necesitated but Intels loss of the X86 top dog crown to its licensee AMD when Amd's A64s started slapping Intels products at lower clockspeed because of a superior design.
Stated more simply, your probably better of with the Core2, especially if that CPU can be upgraded. Core2 help us all regain some measure of respect for Intel (on my part begrudged).