Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: eFlash vs Kickflash  (Read 3298 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Crusher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 385
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.hast-enterprises.se
Re: eFlash vs Kickflash
« on: August 28, 2006, 01:35:08 PM »
I have both, KickflashOS4(In my A3KT, see sign) have a clockport and works with Z2-machines.
eFlash4000(In my A3KD, vanilla) is fast and works only on Z3-machines. Using this to boot from Buddha.

No problems with either card, they do the work.  :-)
Logged
Mainframe: Amiga 3000 Tower, CSPPC233/060, 144+2MB, 36GB UW, Prometheus, Voodoo5 5500, 10Mbit, 24xCDr, OS 4.0 ....Amiga since 1987.
 

Offline Crusher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 385
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.hast-enterprises.se
Re: eFlash vs Kickflash
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2006, 02:50:17 PM »
No diff in speed. :-D
Altough the eFlash is claimed to be faster because of the Z3 interface. I have the 1MB eFlash(i.e. the first ver.) have hadn´t any problem with the space in just booting my OS3.9.
Logged
Mainframe: Amiga 3000 Tower, CSPPC233/060, 144+2MB, 36GB UW, Prometheus, Voodoo5 5500, 10Mbit, 24xCDr, OS 4.0 ....Amiga since 1987.
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »