Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: graphic card  (Read 10025 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TjLaZer

Re: graphic card
« on: July 23, 2004, 12:53:44 AM »
I whole heartedly recommend the Cybervision 64!  1.  It is faster than any card except maybe the Picass IV, and 2.  It complements the Amiga 3000 very well, as it integrates nicely with the built-in Scan Doubler/Flicker Fixer.  You simply daisy chain the supplied cable to the VGA port on the 3000, and you have a 1 monitor solution.  If you were to get a Cybervision 64/3D without the Scan Doubler you would not be able to view native screens without a monitor switcher.  Not sure on the GVP Spectrum, but the CV64 is faster.  I use one in my 3000 system and it rocks.
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 

Offline TjLaZer

Re: graphic card
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2004, 01:32:05 AM »
Whats the Cybevision 64 card going for these days?  I paid $150 for mine 3 years ago on eBay...
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 

Offline TjLaZer

Re: graphic card
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2004, 05:28:17 AM »
I run my Cybervision 64/3D at 1152X864 on my A4000 and 1024X768 on my A3000 w/Cybervision 64.  Both at 16Bit.
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 

Offline TjLaZer

Re: graphic card
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2004, 09:17:31 PM »
I found the speed hit from 16bit to 24bit was not worth the very minute color depth increase.  I could hardly tell the difference and speed is more important to me.  I even use 16bit on iBrowse on a seperate window!  I use Picasso96, I think it is faster and better RTG system.
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana: