Well, I guess to those of with experience of the Pegasos platform this looks like nothing but pure flamebait...so lets just review:
1. Pegasos 1 had (and still has) some serious problems...there is a lot of information in the public domain about this and it's no secret about the painful Artica S, April I, April II evolution...The Peg I could not be made to work reliably with a G4.
2. 600MHz with a 100/133MHz FSB is slow compared with latest PCs - no arguement with that, but it does depend on application. People use old Pentium 200 Mhz boxes for firewalls, mail servers etc. running linux and it's certainly way more capable than that.
3. Only a few G4 machines in USA...well pardon me if I don;t fall over in surprise. Again, there is plenty of public domain information stated by the head honchos that they are struggling in the transition from bleeding money into the platform into making it a profitable entity. Sales aren't what anyone expected (same applies to A1 for example)...but I do see progress, getting assosciated with IBM, visibility in Motorola for example. It's also publically stated that production is occurring in small batches (low 100s) for this very reason. A G4 Pegasos II costs $600 to $700..this is no small investment (but see point 5)
4. Open firmware could be bugged for all I know - I'm not qualified to know. I've seen other people discussing issues regarding device tree, CPU enumeration. I assume they will be fixed in time.
5. Cost - it's very competetive for a PPC platform. I don't think he has a point here unless you want to open the old chestnut of comparing Apples with Oranges i.e. PPC vs x86
6. Genesi as a working business entity - again there's plenty of public domain knowledge regarding their financial situation and we all know it's not good - even top management posted this information! (pretty unusual IMO)
As to their business practice _ I really don't have any inside information or knowledge. If Theo does then I might consider myself forewarned, however:
7. The tone of the post is pure flamery...irrespective of how competent the person is (and I surely don't know him from Adam) This just reduces the impact of the statement.
So it looks like some of his points are way of base and on a few there is still work to be done...
Sound fair?
Steve