Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: SFS or PFS ?  (Read 2755 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tenacious

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 1362
    • Show all replies
Re: SFS or PFS ?
« on: February 14, 2007, 11:33:59 PM »
I have been using PFS2 (yes, 2) for 10 years or more.  It's much faster than FFS.

I had a problem only once with the partition where IBrowse caches files.  To fix that partion, I had to reformat that whole drive (I could have left it alone with a dead partition. Nah, not me.)  Since that time, I only cache browser files to the Ram disk.  This works great and I've never had another hint of a problem.