From the rules:
This feature is intended to promote positive imput and discussion, though that's not to say that we'll ban any hint of controversy. Obvious trolling and "Amiga is dead" articles without good justification aren't wanted,...
It's
controversial and
not positive to state what's been obvious for a decade, and to follow official Amiga, Inc. trademark guidelines as stated on their website ("Do not write 'the new Amiga'", etc.)?
I think the word you're looking for is not "controversy" in this case, but "redundancy".
If you mean the company "Amiga, Inc", I guess it wouldn't be too hard for many to justify writing an article about their death.
