Y'see that's the ATTITUDE I'm talking about.
Linux *Users* are generally very helpful and polite.
I merely gave you an example of the irrational thinking of some users, didnt see anything wrong with that.
But the self-proclaimed gurus with 20 years plus experience or, worse, the maintainers of a distro.
I'm not a guru, but I do know quite a bit about UNIX and Linux being that I am a Sys Admin and a Software Engineer for the company I work for and also I do the same on the side for my own company.
As a matter of fact, right here in my home office I have a few 1U servers... I have 1 NAS running FreeBSD, 1 backup NAS running Solaris 10 x86-64bit, 2 servers running CentOS Linux 6.5 (one runs some sites I host for a handful of companies, even my personal site and the other for my security system), 1 sandbox server running Solaris 10 (I wipe it and install whatever I need to test), 2 dual-quad core CentOS 6.5 Servers running GunsNet.net, AK-47.net and a spare dual-quad core for when I am going to virtualize 2 servers in the next few weeks.
But the self-proclaimed gurus with 20 years plus experience or, worse, the maintainers of a distro.
I'm not trying to convert ex-users into current users. Not my battle, not my problem. People have their own choice. I just want a level playing field for potential users. Throwing FUD and seeing what sticks isnt exactly level, so I help tilt it back in the right direction.
Or more accurately the question should be why your dad *didn't* have issues like that. Find that out, bottle it and distribute with a GNU license.
Well, he went from openSuSE to Linux Mint, only because of my personal disdain for Gnome 3. There's nothing to distribute and slap a GNU license on, its already freely available for all to enjoy.
Yes here we go again-blame the user. Its always the user.
I know, its always the OS.