Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The Great Capacity Swindle  (Read 8040 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Boudicca

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 438
    • Show all replies
Re: The Great Capacity Swindle
« on: May 01, 2008, 12:04:55 AM »
Not Really a Swindle....

Heres a explanation from wikipedia.

"Hard disk drive manufacturers specify disk capacity using the SI prefixes mega-, giga- and tera-, and their abbreviations M, G and T. Byte is typically abbreviated B.

Most operating-system tools report capacity using the same abbreviations but actually use binary prefixes. For instance, the prefix mega-, which normally means 10^6 (1,000,000), in the context of data storage can mean 2^20 (1,048,576), which is nearly 5% more. Similar usage has been applied to prefixes of greater magnitude. This results in a discrepancy between the disk manufacturer's stated capacity and the apparent capacity of the drive when examined through most operating-system tools. The difference becomes even more noticeable (7%) for a gigabyte. For example, Microsoft Windows reports disk capacity both in decimal-based units to 12 or more significant digits and with binary-based units to three significant digits. Thus a disk specified by a disk manufacturer as a 30 GB disk might have its capacity reported by Windows 2000 both as "30,065,098,568 bytes" and "28.0 GB". The disk manufacturer used the SI definition of "giga", 10^9 to arrive at 30 GB; however, because the utilities provided by Windows, Mac and some Linux distributions define a gigabyte as 1,073,741,824 bytes (2^30 bytes, often referred to as a gibibyte, or GiB), the operating system reports capacity of the disk drive as (only) 28.0 GB."

See Pyrre explanation...thats better than wikipedia....good one! :). I couldn't be bothered to do the math.
was Enterprise Vault (Its an Exchange Fail!), now its EMC Avamar, Dedupe for mostly everything including brain cells.