Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why did commodore went under?  (Read 10607 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lsmart

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 433
    • Show all replies
Re: Why did commodore went under?
« on: August 10, 2012, 11:54:11 PM »
I think Commodores problem was that upper management really believed that they were better off selling PC-hardware developed by other companies under the powerful Commodore brand. They didn`t undestand that it was the technology what made Commodore successful.

The A600, 264 and CDTV where great, but they didn`t get the money and attention to bring them to the market fast, complete and with the right advertizing and software, because the money was wasted elsewhere.
 

Offline lsmart

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 433
    • Show all replies
Re: Why did commodore went under?
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2012, 03:15:25 PM »
Quote from: persia;702964
 The 90's were converging on the PC. [...]
But as I said, even though Commodore management was thoroughly incompetent it made no difference, there was no winning move.

I am not so sure about that. It`s hard to say what would have happened, if Commodore never sold PCs and had a 3D capable Amiga 1200 ready in 1992.

It`s hard to say what would have happened, if Commodore took the other route and abandoned Amiga in favor of x86 in 1988 and introduced a Commodore PC that was capable of running Workbench on MS-DOS and had a good video- and sound interface before Windows, SVGA and Soundblaster 16 would conquer the market.