Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?  (Read 2725 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lsmart

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 433
    • Show all replies
Re: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?
« on: September 12, 2009, 03:16:25 PM »
Quote from: Karlos;522828
I like the WB2.x topaz 8 font when viewed in the hires non-lace modes. I wish there were an equivalent that preserved the appearence on square pixel displays


I once ran the 1.3 Topaz trough yourfonts.com to get a TrueType-Version I edited the font with fontforge to make it usable. Still it was a little funky. :afro:
However, I like the OS4 Deja-Vu font so I never tried my Retro Topaz on Workbench but I use it occasionally on Windows for source code.

http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/

http://www.yourfonts.com/