Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: blender benchmarks  (Read 14948 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 217
    • Show all replies
Re: blender benchmarks
« on: February 03, 2012, 03:41:15 PM »
Quote from: itix;678976
Or in other words -- when data no longer fits in L2 cache in G4 then 1682M is winner?


This is why i'd be rather curious to see the result of the benchmark i suggested:
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?mode=viewtopic&topic_id=35053&forum=33&start=240&viewmode=flat&order=0#650877

But this thread suddenly got very silent.
 

Offline Fab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 217
    • Show all replies
Re: blender benchmarks
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2012, 04:36:15 PM »
Quote from: wawrzon;678991
@fab:

btw heres your result, just seen it posted over at awnet:



so its again confirming the previous tests.

sigh, i hoped the ban will keep me off there, but it doesnt seem to work that way..


Yes. Though the time spent in I/O seems a bit too high (probably some other factor). But in the end, the X1000 is just marginally faster than the Mac mini to decode the stream (82.8s against 84.6s). I actually expected better there. I'll just wait a bit to be sure this test was also done with AltiVec (even if it wouldn't be drastically different with or without it, unlike LAME).