Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Reaction vs MUI (as what concerns the API)  (Read 39429 times)

Description:

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 217
    • Show all replies
Re: Reaction vs MUI (as what concerns the API)
« on: February 13, 2011, 02:37:41 PM »
Quote from: lsmart;615251
Like QT is for some random desktops like KDE?

AWeb was something you had to install in 1995. AWeb was the modern internet.


And can you name any other significant application using classact/reaction for 3.x? I can't.
 

Offline Fab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 217
    • Show all replies
Re: Reaction vs MUI (as what concerns the API)
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2011, 03:40:16 PM »
Quote from: lsmart;615259
I just think that we are reading pointless bashing instead of a well balanced analysis here.


Indeed. Saying Reaction is better because it was renamed from a 3rd party toolkit (classact) and made "official" by Haage&Partner is far from being a well balanced analysis.
 

Offline Fab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 217
    • Show all replies
Re: Reaction vs MUI (as what concerns the API)
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2011, 10:01:16 PM »
Quote from: lsmart;615332
Well, great then. Discussion over.


If you want to have a real discussion, try to find areas where reaction is superior (preferably not of the "official" or "someone told me..." kind), and then we can talk.

The only remotely relevant argument that was given so far is about speed, but there's no benchmark to prove it, which means it may just be wishful thinking or propaganda fruits.