I prefer 68k because

[ElPolloDiabl]

Right now I am only using a fairly minimal install of Workbench. I still have to relearn things.
My computer should be able to do all computer tasks, I don't need it as a media player.

I'm pulling right out of the AROS camp, but there are plenty of users who prefer that.

I will buy a PowerPC Amiga when the price is a bit lower. Especially if I like on the UAE emulator.

[ElPolloDiabl]

When I said I don't like AROS.
I really meant I don't care for AROS on x86/ x64. It doesn't have anything more that Linux has and Linux will do it better.
The developers must not want it to be a 1/1 clone of OS3.1

AROS 68k is very good.

[ElPolloDiabl]

@above
It's free can't complain, but any modern software I would like to use would be available on Linux as well.

It also used cheap batteries, capacitors, and thieving executives.

Funny LOL except ordinary electrolytic capacitors should only last about ten years.

[ElPolloDiabl]

In this discussion I use 68k software a lot more.

PowerPC must be faster for the moment. FPGA may become faster in future.

Really I wanted to find out what was missing from AROS, MorphOS and OS4