Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: lame benchmarks (pun intended)  (Read 21996 times)

Description:

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ami_stuff

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 100
    • Show all replies
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« on: February 03, 2012, 01:07:47 AM »
Quote from: haywirepc;678881
Where can I find a windows binary of this lame encoder? Looked but only found source tarballs. I'd like to run this test on a windows and linux machine and see the results and how they stack up against x1000 on quad core and 6 core intel machines.

Steven

http://www.rarewares.org/mp3-lame-bundle.php


Athlon XP 2600+ :)

Quote
C:\>lame AKsack.wav
LAME 3.99.4 32bits (http://lame.sf.net)
CPU features: MMX (ASM used), 3DNow! (ASM used), SSE (ASM used)
Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 16538 Hz - 17071 Hz
Encoding AKsack.wav to AKsack.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (11x) 128 kbps qval=3
    Frame          |  CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU |    ETA
 10529/10529 (100%)|    0:16/    0:16|    0:16/    0:16|   16.975x|    0:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   kbps        MS  %     long switch short %
  128.0      100.0        74.4  13.4  12.2
Writing LAME Tag...done
ReplayGain: +0.5dB
« Last Edit: February 03, 2012, 01:16:40 AM by ami_stuff »