Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why C= never made a 65816 based machine?  (Read 12486 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show all replies
Re: Why C= never made a 65816 based machine?
« on: August 06, 2012, 10:53:10 PM »
Quote from: WolfToTheMoon;702532
65816 is much more cycle efficient than 68K... as long as your using 16 bit data and relatively simple instruction, it can be even more than 2 times the speed of an 68000... however, 68000 is much faster on 32 bit ops and has more registers and more instructions... it's a better chip, no doubt, but a well optimized code for the 65816 will FLY!!!


I would also think that the 65816 programmers would have to struggle with the same type of segmented memory architecture issues that DOS and early windows and OS/2 programmers had to deal with when trying work with more than 64K RAM.