Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Commodore without Mehdi Ali  (Read 24163 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show all replies
Re: Commodore without Mehdi Ali
« on: September 18, 2011, 03:37:53 AM »
Quote from: restore2003;40926
This has probably been discussed before, but what the heck  ;-)

Where would Amiga been today if Commodore did not hire Mehdi Ali as their Chief, and did not cancel the AAA chipset?

 :-?

I think by the early 90s it was clear that the Amiga was falling behind technology wise. It was still a nice entry level PC, they had dedicated engineers, good 3rd party hardware support, and a devoted following.

Without Ali and all of the destructive turmoil and total lack of strategy he caused whatever they did it would have been for the better.

Still, "Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss". You never know...

Although Hitler was dead and Charlie Manson was incarcerated.

I have read that the final blow to Commodore was they were struggling for cash due to the   inability to import anything in the US market because of an injunction by a federal court  over Cad Track for their use of their XOR cursor patent.

Even if they continued to fumble along in the low-end market Commodore and the Amiga could have easily been saved. It would not even have taken a Steve Jobs. Steve Ballmer could have done it or 90% of anyone named Steve. Anyone who could have effectively dealt with the Cad Track situation.

The Cad Track thing was total BS.
What a ridiculously easy concept concept to have a patent for.
Amiga uses a sprite for the pointer anyway!

At the very least they could have made some sort of deal to survive.

It is like dying of strep throat or something that is easily treated with antibiotics.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 06:31:03 AM by bbond007 »
 

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show all replies
Re: Commodore without Mehdi Ali
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2011, 06:28:07 AM »
Quote from: freqmax;659797

What computer used that patent?


I'm not sure. I would think that patent more pertain to products like GEM based stuff (like Ventura Publisher and Atari ST),  Windows, drawing software, etc. Anything that uses a  mouse pointer that does not have hardware sprites.

Ideally you want a pointer that does not destroy the underling content as you move it about the screen. There are various ways to accomplish this. The Amiga way would be the Sprite.

The Cad Track thing worked on the basic principle that if you take any number and XOR or another number twice the end result is always same number you started with.

1 xor 4 xor 4 = 1
2 xor 4 xor 4 = 2
3 xor 4 xor 4 = 3
etc...

Lets say the 123 this is the contents of my screen and the 4's represent my pointer (shaped like a +).

123 xor _4_ = 163 xor _4_ = 123
123 xor 444 = 567 xor 444 = 123
123 xor _4_ = 163 xor _4_ = 123

I can place the cursor on the screen with one XOR operation and remove it with the second XOR. This is very fast because I don't need to save the underling contents of the screen in order to restore it.

The ugly but somewhat useful side-effect is that the pointer changes colors depending on the underling screen content.

This is useful because you can always see the cursor. You don't have the situation where you have a red pointer obscured because it is directly over a red object.

So, What computer used that patent? No Commodore computer I can think of. Perhaps some feature of the Bit Blitter?

That was the nail in Commodores coffin. Sad but true!
 

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show all replies
Re: Commodore without Mehdi Ali
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2011, 06:51:02 AM »
Quote from: freqmax;659797
What computer used that patent?)

Here we go... I think I may have found it.... Amiga Workbench....

I bet its not the pointer but the window outline when you move/resize windows.

See how the line changes colors depending on the underling screen content?

That for sure is the result of using an XOR operation.....
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 06:53:45 AM by bbond007 »