Well, first off, I didn't start the thread to become some kind of flame war calling people stupid. And murple, the thread is for fun and at least keeping ideas fresh. If we never talked about the new Amiga subject because there are "old threads" about the topic, nothing would ever be done to move forward. Silly or not, it keeps the idea going and its kind of fun.
Here is my personal opinion regarding the questions I asked. Mind you, I'm a software engineer, not a hardware guru--so I can't really tell you the problems associated with Motorola vs. Intel vs. PPC, etc. Maybe that's why I asked the questions in the first place.
Here it is:
The Amiga originally was an incredible machine that could deliver graphics/sound/multitasking at an affordable price (yes, affordable--PCs were thousands of dollars). The Amiga would need some kind of "niche" to fill that's not being currently exploited. Of course the affordability would suffer, I would think, but there would a new draw to the Amiga.
I would like to think that the new Amiga would have an architecture that would not be held back by backward compatibility, as the PC seems to be. Why couldn't backward compatibility be provided in software emulation?
There would need to be incentives for developing software for it. Maybe a killer app that really fills the "niche"?
On more realistic note, however, I think Hyperion (sp?) has the right idea. An OS would seem to be the most logical way to promote the Amiga despite the hardware it runs on. Of course I know nothing about AmigaOS, but it seems to be the only way the Amiga will stay around. Hopefully Hyperion stays around, too.
In the end, of course, it's a pipe dream, but it's still fun to discuss. And I think it's good to bring it up, regardless of critics that think it's pointless.
Thanks, for the silly fun.
Chris