Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's  (Read 5268 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline curtisTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1049
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.suddenlink.net/pages/curtismc
Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« on: February 19, 2017, 04:20:10 PM »
Okay, this may be a moot point, but how does the plipbox compare to a more "normal" network interface card?

I know the plipbox is, obviously, much easier to acquire, but how does the throughput speeds compare?
Outside a dog, a book is a man\'s best friend. Inside a dog it\'s too dark to read! Groucho Marx

Curtis McCain

http://pages.suddenlink.net/curtismc/
 

Offline curtisTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1049
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.suddenlink.net/pages/curtismc
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2017, 11:35:07 PM »
Quote from: Matt_H;822440
I would imagine it's limited to the speed of the parallel port, so slower than a Zorro or PCMCIA card. Chief advantage is that it can be attached to Amigas large and small, so it's an easy way to get a 500 or CDTV on the LAN. Better to have a slow network than no network ;)

That's pretty much what I figured.  So all the talk of a plipbox being 10MB is good right up to where it enters the Amiga!
Outside a dog, a book is a man\'s best friend. Inside a dog it\'s too dark to read! Groucho Marx

Curtis McCain

http://pages.suddenlink.net/curtismc/