Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: New ppc board by Acube/A-Eon: A1222 "Tabor"  (Read 134587 times)

Description:

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline aperez

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 90
    • Show all replies
    • http://inertial.biz
Re: New ppc board by Acube/A-Eon: A1222 "Tabor"
« on: October 20, 2015, 05:00:53 PM »
Quote from: psxphill;797634

The e200mc (used in the P204x and later) is just missing two instructions from the PowerPC FPU.


This is factually incorrect, though it may be a typo. P2040/P2041 is e500mc based.l

Quote from: psxphill;797634

We could all just buy http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/P2041RDB-PC/P2041RDB-PC-ND/4234547 http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1854648.pdf which is likely going to be cheaper than the slower A1222


No, you couldn't, because it's no longer manufactured. See the Freescale page for it. Freescale has legitimate business reasons for only making a finite number of reference development boards. The distributors may have small quantities of stock, but they rarely stock more than one or two, and once they're gone, they're gone for good.

Regardless, this is a thread about Tabor, not about what you think Tabor should have been. If you want to discuss other Freescale parts, start a thread about it, or better yet, don't :)
 

Offline aperez

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 90
    • Show all replies
    • http://inertial.biz
Re: New ppc board by Acube/A-Eon: A1222 "Tabor"
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2015, 05:10:55 PM »
Quote from: matthey;797666
Maybe we need a poll. Which of the following choices best applies to the P1022 PPC CPU choice without a compatible PPC FPU for the Tabor motherboard?

1) poor decision
2) bad decision
3) desperation


Listen, trollmaster...statements such as this do not contribute anything of value to this discussion. Give it a rest. Don't you have something more constructive you could be doing?

Quote from: matthey;797666

30% faster integer performance will make some applications feel snappier while others with heavy floating point use (like Blender) will likely run at a fraction of the speed of a PPC with standard FPU. It's kind of like hiring a motivated worker who is missing one arm. He may be a little faster than average at some jobs but is going to have major trouble doing some work.


I'd like to steer this conversation back towards reality for a moment... If someone buys a dual-core PPC32 machine and expects to be running Blender on it, well, that's just crazy. This isn't a machine for that. The recommended hardware for Blender at the moment is a 64-bit, quad-core CPU with 8GB RAM. This is not the type of hardware you would EVER seriously consider running Blender on.