Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: dnetc benchmarks  (Read 38222 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakumo9275

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 301
    • Show all replies
    • http://mega-tokyo.com/blog
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« on: February 04, 2012, 02:42:13 PM »
I'm starting to wonder if the compilers for the pa6t are just crap and its hitting cache misses/branch misses etc and nuking its pipelines. I'd expect similar results of x1000 to the other g4's when it comes to raw cpu tasks...

and it may just be the pa6t really isnt all that fantastic and meeting the hype....
--/\\-[ Stu ]-/\\--
Commodore 128DCR, JiffyDOS, Ultimate 1541 II, uIEC/SD, CBM 1902A  Monitor
 

Offline yakumo9275

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 301
    • Show all replies
    • http://mega-tokyo.com/blog
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2012, 05:45:32 PM »
Quote from: Krashan;679156
PA6T is not a G4. Its core is an independent design. And for sure it is not the 8-th wonder of the world.


did I say it was? I said It expected its raw compute power to be on par with the other g4s, meaning the 3 g4's cpu's in the benchmark.

my only thought is the g4 compiler pipeline is mature, the pa6t is not, and I just wonder if poor compiler support is more to blame for the initial showing of low benchmarks in areas I'd expect it to be on par with g4 class cpu's.
--/\\-[ Stu ]-/\\--
Commodore 128DCR, JiffyDOS, Ultimate 1541 II, uIEC/SD, CBM 1902A  Monitor
 

Offline yakumo9275

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 301
    • Show all replies
    • http://mega-tokyo.com/blog
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2012, 05:01:10 PM »
Quote from: Piru;679812
*) Someone doing some linux benchmarking would easily be able to tell if the issue is a software one.


not if the issue is GCC related.
--/\\-[ Stu ]-/\\--
Commodore 128DCR, JiffyDOS, Ultimate 1541 II, uIEC/SD, CBM 1902A  Monitor