PA6T is not a G4. Its core is an independent design. And for sure it is not the 8-th wonder of the world.
did I say it was? I said It expected its raw compute power to be on par with the other g4s, meaning the 3 g4's cpu's in the benchmark.
my only thought is the g4 compiler pipeline is mature, the pa6t is not, and I just wonder if poor compiler support is more to blame for the initial showing of low benchmarks in areas I'd expect it to be on par with g4 class cpu's.