Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga 2000...SCSI or IDE. Which is better?  (Read 4868 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline barneyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 555
    • Show all replies
Amiga 2000...SCSI or IDE. Which is better?
« on: July 09, 2009, 01:48:54 PM »
I have a question that sombody can probably answer.  Which is a better option on an Amiga 2000...SCSI or IDE?  Which is better and why?  Also, is it possible to have both SCSI and IDE running simultaneously in a single system?  Thanks.

Barney
 

Offline barneyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 555
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga 2000...SCSI or IDE. Which is better?
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2009, 02:31:42 PM »
Is an Amiga 2000 w 2630 accelerator (68030) sufficient to handle a Buddha card?  Would I see any type of slowdowns while transfering data?

Barney
 

Offline barneyTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 555
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga 2000...SCSI or IDE. Which is better?
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2009, 03:27:14 PM »
Does having a Buddha installed slow the system down in every way or just when it's in use (reading/writing files).  I am thinking of buying one and installing it in my Amiga 2000 in order to install my LS120 superdisk and an additional hard drive.  If the IDE peripherals aren't being used, will my system still be slower than if the Buddha wern't installed at all?

Also, having additional drives hooked up, will I need a bigger power supply or is the stock Amiga 2000 hard drive sufficient?

Thanks.

Barney