@Rassilon
I've only read the Haynie document briefly, but they way I understand it, he wasn't interested in MOS, if it is only a copy of AmigaOS. What MOS-user should do, is to tell people like myself, that has not followed the MOS-discussions, or tried it out, what exactly is it that makes morphOS than AmigaOS? I am sure there must be many things, otherwise I don't understand the appeal for MorphOS.
@Cyberus
I understand russian! he he
